涂料工业 ›› 2013, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 64-68.

• 标准及检测 • 上一篇    下一篇

M310和AP1000核电站用涂料性能指标对比

袁旭光1,王留方2   

  1. 1、湖南桃花江核电有限公司,湖南益阳 413000;2、中海油常州环保涂料有限公司,江苏常州 213014
  • 出版日期:2013-10-01 发布日期:2019-05-28
  • 作者简介:袁旭光(1973一),男,高工,主要从事核电站用涂料的施工应用研究。

Comparison Analysis on Technical Specification of Coatings Used in AP1000 and M310 Nuclear Power Plants

Yuan Xuguang1, Wang Liufang2   

  1. 1.Hunan Taohuajiang nuclear power Co.,Ltd., Yiyang, Hunan 413000, China; 2. CNOOC Changzhou EP Coating Co., Ltd., Changzhou, Jiangsu 213014, China
  • Online:2013-10-01 Published:2019-05-28

摘要: AP1000核电站是第三代核电技术,M310核电站是二代加核电技术,其各个部位都需要涂层进行防护。由于堆型的不同,对涂层的要求也不尽相同。本研究将M310和AP1000这2种堆型核电站用涂料的性能指标进行对比,由于AP1000核电站为美国西屋公司的技术,技术条件在不断变化和升版,其AP1000核电站用涂料的技术条件也在不断变化,最终以升版后的技术条件为准。

关键词: 核电站, AP1000, M310, 核性能试验

Abstract: AP1000 nuclear power plant is the third generation nuclear technology and M310 nuclear power plant is the second 'generation nuclear technology. And all the structure parts of the plants need to be protected by protective coatings. For different types of nuclear reactors, the requirement for coatings are not the same. In this paper, the techinical specification of coatings used in AP1000 and M310 nuclear power plants were compared. Since AP1000 nuclear power plant was imported technology from Westinghouse Corporation, US, in which the technical requirement were changing and upgrading freguently, so as the technical specification for protective coatings. Therefore the final upgraded version of the technical specification will be used as the criterion.

Key words: nuclear power plant, AP1000, M310, nuclear performance test