摘要: 【目的】进一步提升航空飞行器抗爆性能。【方法】以 4种抗爆涂料为研究对象,采用有限元模拟软件进行抗爆性能模拟计算,确定硬质聚脲体系抗爆性能最佳。并在此基础上,通过调整 n(—NH2)∶n(—NCO),加入功能填料,制得新型抗爆涂料,并进行 TNT平爆试验来验证涂料的抗爆性能。【结果】硬质聚脲涂覆厚度为 6 mm时,抗爆性能最佳,防护效果为 31. 62%;在硬质聚脲的基础上,n (—NH2)∶n(—NCO)为 1∶1. 05,碳纳米管添加量为 1%时,涂层达到最佳抗爆性能,仅需涂覆 4 mm厚度,防护效果n达到 28. 24%,接近硬质聚脲 6 mm厚的防护效果。【结论】研制的产品在满足航空飞行器抗爆性能的同时,降低了涂层厚度,实现了航空飞行器抗爆涂层的轻量化要求。
关键词:
航空飞行器,
抗爆涂料,
聚脲,
数值模拟,
靶板挠度
Abstract: [Objective] In order to further enhance the anti-blast performance of aerospace vehicles,[Methods]four types of anti-blast coatings were selected as research objects. The finiteelement simulation software was used to simulate the anti-detonation performance to determine the bestanti-detonation performance of the rigid polyurea system. On this basis,a new type of anti-blast coatings were developed by adjusting the n(—NH2)∶n(—NCO)ratio and adding functional fillers. The anti-blast performance of the anti-blast coating was verified through TNT flat explosion tests.[Results]The simulation and flat explosion test results showed that when the hard polyurea coatingthickness was 6 mm,the anti-blast performance was the best,with a protection effect of 31. 62%. On the basis of hard polyurea,when the n(—NH2)∶n(—NCO)ratio was 1∶1. 05 and the carbon nanotube addition amount was 1%,the anti-blast coating could achieve the best anti-blast performance,onlyrequiring a coating thickness of 4 mm,with a protection effect of 28. 24%,approaching the protection effect of the 6 mm thick hard polyurea coating.[Conclusion]The developed product not only meet theanti-blast performance requirements of aerospace vehicles but also reducing the coating thickness, achieving the lightweight requirements of anti-blast coatings aerospace vehicles.
Key words:
aerospace vehicle,
anti-explosive coatings,
polyurea,
numerical simulation,
target plate deflection
中图分类号:
王红妮, 陈素明, 岳珊, 等. 基于爆炸载荷仿真的航空飞行器用轻量化抗爆涂层性能提升研究 [J]. 涂料工业, 2025, 55(7): 59-64.
WANGH N, CHEN S M, YUE S, et al. Study on the Performance Enhancement of Lightweight Blast-resistant Coatings for Aerospace Vehicles Based on Blast Load Simulation[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2025, 55(7): 59-64.